Tomaž Žibert wrote:
I always thought 20/20 is as good as it gets, obviously not

.
Well it depends on what you actually want and right now I am absolutely over the moon with my eyesight which is only getting better.
I might look into the 20/50 vision, just to see what is possible and probably try that out too. Sky is the limit

Sorry to have confused you. You should probably look up how an eye chart works. 20 feet (or nearly 6m) is the distance of testing, and normal acuity is the 20 line. Normal acuity should be capable of reading the 50 line at 50' (approximately 15m) but if you can see 20/50 that means that what the "normal eye" (as Dr. Snellen thought) can see at 15m, you can only see at 6m. So that is worse than 20/20. 20/10 (6/3) means that what the normal eye can only see at 10 feet (3m) you can see at 20 feet (6m). Again, research visual acuity to get a better understanding.