Bifocal Wrote:found this study to verify the anticorrective lense method.

Bifocal Wrote:Well both of you have listed many links ,but I wonder why you did not mention the present study being done jointly by the Federal Aviation Administration,The U.S Air Force,

Bifocal Wrote:I have to say that it tells me a lot about your motives.You do not like competing authors,and money seems to motivate you,more than trying to truly help people.

clarknight Wrote:Made a decision today;

When I get to the other side, (after death) I do not want to have to explain to the nice people in heaven, including Dr. Bates, Emily that I spent years holding onto the E-books, Bates magazines waiting to earn enough money to place them on-line free. This day may never come and during this wait many people that could have obtained access to this information, complete training but had no money (many people are from low income countries or areas of the U.S.) so they cannot have access to the books, learn how to be free of eyeglasses, obtain clear eyesight, healthy eyes.

So today I have decided to place all E-books free, permanently;

http://cleareyesight-batesmethod.info/id120.html

The website earns enough money selling paperbacks and it seems that most people prefer the paper or Kindle.

I have thought of doing this for a long time. The pirates, some cured students, including some cured blind students and other e-book sales people from ClickBank... have been stealing and reselling the download page, 17 E-books for a much higher price than I was selling for; $40.00 and into hundreds of dollars for the exact same package. A chiropractor in California was doing this and making videos of the book but teaching the method 30% wrong. I hear he is still doing it.

People need a honest deal, so for Dr. Bates and the public, 'his patients', the books are free.

Thanks to Bifocal and the Otis gang for the insults, false statements. It made up my mind.
Now all people can fully compare the true natural Bates Method and the unnatural Plus lens method and learn to avoid the harm of the Plus Lens, Anti-Corrective Method.
Stay with the Bates Method. Dr. Bates original true practice.

People also now have a choice of buying another Italy, Russian, UK sellers $400.00 Better Eyesight Magazines or our exact Magazines with extra practices, pictures, eyecharts added;
Price; free view on your computer or buy ink, paper and print your own books, magazines.

(09-28-2013, 08:56 PM)Bifocal Wrote: A close friends daughter age 19,always had excellent vision throughout grade school,and high school.
She is studying for an engineering degree,and also taking flying lessons,and would like to be an airline pilot.
During her second year of college,she noticed some distance blur,and when she went to renew her pilot medical certificate,she failed the vision exam. She was told by the FAA doctor to see an optometrist.At the optometrist it was determined that she had 20/50 vision in each eye,and was prescribed a minus 1.00 for each eye.She began wearing the glasses for flying,driving,and college classroom,but soon found them more comfortable to wear full time. After only three months with the glasses she felt that she again was not seeing properly,and went back to the optometrist,and learned that her vision was now 20/100,and given minus 1.50 lenses for each eye. By the end of the school year last spring she had gone back again to the optometrist,and then found to be 20/200,and given minus 2.50 glasses.Both her FAA doctor,and her optometrist were concerned at how rapidly her vision had declined,and she was totally dependent on glasses now.
During her summer break,her father,and I discussed the anticorrective lense method for her. She was very excited about trying it.
She started off by wearing her distance glasses for everything except reading,and computer.For those two activities,she began wearing plus .50 glasses,which she could only tolerate for about a half an hour at first. She built up her close vision work with these glasses until she could read for two hours with them,and then increased the plus glasses to 1.00. These also were hard to use for more than a half hour,but as she became used to using them she found her distance glasses a bit too strong,so she went to her minus 1.50 glasses for most activities.Again when she could read comfortably for two or more hours with the plus 1.00 glasses,she went to plus 1.50. Shortly after being able to read for about an hour or more with these glasses,she quit using distance glasses all together. She is back at college now,and has surprised her FAA doctor with 20/20 vision in each eye.
She still uses plus 1.00 glasses for extensive close work,but has 20/20 close up vision,and can read fine without the glasses.She just feels that using them for extensive close work keeps her eyes tuned up for excellent distance vision.
Her optometrist examined her prior to her going back to school,and was simply amazed that she had 20/20 vision. He told her that he had felt that she had developed late onset myopia,and that she would have ended up with a minus 6.,or 7.00 prescription.. He had never heard of the anticorrective lense method,and was quite impressed.
She of course is overjoyed that she does not have to worry about myopia possibly ruining her career as a pilot.

(03-12-2014, 01:23 AM)Bifocal Wrote: This young lady also said that in her conversation with the military,and university Ophthalmologists,there was some discussion about the Bates Method,and that the overall opinion of these Ophthalmologists was that it had no value as far as pilot vision was concerned,and that a method much like the Anticorrective Method will be used.